<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1456 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362629</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act as the underlying addition was deleted. The Tribunal upheld the assessment but rejected the application of Section 153C regarding seized documents from a third party. The addition made by the Assessing Officer was deemed unjustified due to lack of evidence linking the documents to the assessee. The decision was pronounced on 27th June 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 07:17:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1456 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362629</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act as the underlying addition was deleted. The Tribunal upheld the assessment but rejected the application of Section 153C regarding seized documents from a third party. The addition made by the Assessing Officer was deemed unjustified due to lack of evidence linking the documents to the assessee. The decision was pronounced on 27th June 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>