<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1450 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and reinstating the addition of share of loss from two firms to the assessee&#039;s profit under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the share of loss should be added back to profits as per Clause (ii) of the Explanation to Section 115JB, aligning with the correct interpretation of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 07:17:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1450 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and reinstating the addition of share of loss from two firms to the assessee&#039;s profit under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the share of loss should be added back to profits as per Clause (ii) of the Explanation to Section 115JB, aligning with the correct interpretation of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>