<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1444 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362617</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to misdeclaration but reduced the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the Appellant. Despite the misdeclaration, the Tribunal considered the lack of deliberate intent and minimal differential duty, leading to a reduction in the fine to &amp;amp;8377;1 lakh and penalty to &amp;amp;8377;50,000. The judgment emphasized the significance of accurate goods declaration under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 07:16:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1444 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362617</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to misdeclaration but reduced the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the Appellant. Despite the misdeclaration, the Tribunal considered the lack of deliberate intent and minimal differential duty, leading to a reduction in the fine to &amp;amp;8377;1 lakh and penalty to &amp;amp;8377;50,000. The judgment emphasized the significance of accurate goods declaration under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>