https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362606 The Tribunal ruled that the appellant's procurement and clearance of tubes and flaps with tyres did not constitute trading. Therefore, the demand for reversing Cenvat Credit under Rule 6(3)(i) of the CCR, 2004 was deemed unjustified. The Tribunal set aside the challenged orders and allowed the appeals. en-us Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Jul 2018 17:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362606 The Tribunal ruled that the appellant's procurement and clearance of tubes and flaps with tyres did not constitute trading. Therefore, the demand for reversing Cenvat Credit under Rule 6(3)(i) of the CCR, 2004 was deemed unjustified. The Tribunal set aside the challenged orders and allowed the appeals. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362606