https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362601 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the appellant assessee in Appeal No. ST/756/2009, allowing the appeal and rejecting Appeal No. ST/592/2009. The Tribunal held that the Postal and Telegraph Charges were reimbursement of actual expenses and should not be included in the gross value of services rendered for tax purposes, citing legal precedent. The decision was based on established legal principles, affirming the appellant's position and providing a clear resolution to the service tax liability issue. en-us Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jun 2018 07:15:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362601 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the appellant assessee in Appeal No. ST/756/2009, allowing the appeal and rejecting Appeal No. ST/592/2009. The Tribunal held that the Postal and Telegraph Charges were reimbursement of actual expenses and should not be included in the gross value of services rendered for tax purposes, citing legal precedent. The decision was based on established legal principles, affirming the appellant's position and providing a clear resolution to the service tax liability issue. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362601