https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362591 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellants for clandestine removal of goods, citing inconsistencies in the order and the denial of cross-examination to a key witness as violations of natural justice principles. Relying on legal precedents and principles, the Tribunal found the demand unsustainable, leading to the allowance of the appeals. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural fairness and highlighted the significance of upholding natural justice in such cases. en-us Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jun 2018 07:15:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362591 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellants for clandestine removal of goods, citing inconsistencies in the order and the denial of cross-examination to a key witness as violations of natural justice principles. Relying on legal precedents and principles, the Tribunal found the demand unsustainable, leading to the allowance of the appeals. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural fairness and highlighted the significance of upholding natural justice in such cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362591