https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362589 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, holding that they were not required to reverse any credit under Rule 3(5) of CCR, 2004. The impugned orders were set aside, and the Appeals were allowed with consequential relief, if any. The decision confirmed the Appellant's entitlement to the availed cenvat credit and the deemed export status of goods removed to the 100% EOU, aligning with relevant case law and legal provisions. en-us Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jun 2018 07:15:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362589 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, holding that they were not required to reverse any credit under Rule 3(5) of CCR, 2004. The impugned orders were set aside, and the Appeals were allowed with consequential relief, if any. The decision confirmed the Appellant's entitlement to the availed cenvat credit and the deemed export status of goods removed to the 100% EOU, aligning with relevant case law and legal provisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362589