<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1414 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362587</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals partially, ruling that input service credit for Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services beyond Regional Distribution Centers (RDCs) and Corporate Office from 1.4.2008 is not eligible. However, input service credit for other disputed services is deemed eligible both before and after 1.4.2011. The Tribunal set aside all penalties imposed on the appellants. The miscellaneous application seeking a stay of the operation of the impugned order was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 07:15:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1414 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362587</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals partially, ruling that input service credit for Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services beyond Regional Distribution Centers (RDCs) and Corporate Office from 1.4.2008 is not eligible. However, input service credit for other disputed services is deemed eligible both before and after 1.4.2011. The Tribunal set aside all penalties imposed on the appellants. The miscellaneous application seeking a stay of the operation of the impugned order was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>