<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1413 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on limitation, emphasizing the significance of regular return filing and absence of objections during audits in determining the application of the extended period for demands concerning CENVAT credit eligibility and reversal. The decision was in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order solely on the ground of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 07:15:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1413 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on limitation, emphasizing the significance of regular return filing and absence of objections during audits in determining the application of the extended period for demands concerning CENVAT credit eligibility and reversal. The decision was in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order solely on the ground of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>