<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1410 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362583</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the rejection of a refund claim on Customs duty due to limitation but upheld it on the grounds of unjust enrichment. The appellant&#039;s claim, filed within one year of payment but with supporting documents submitted later, was initially rejected for being time-barred. However, the Tribunal found the rejection based on limitation was incorrect. Nonetheless, the rejection was upheld due to unjust enrichment, as the appellant had already passed on the duty burden to customers before filing the claim. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decision on unjust enrichment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 07:15:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1410 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362583</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the rejection of a refund claim on Customs duty due to limitation but upheld it on the grounds of unjust enrichment. The appellant&#039;s claim, filed within one year of payment but with supporting documents submitted later, was initially rejected for being time-barred. However, the Tribunal found the rejection based on limitation was incorrect. Nonetheless, the rejection was upheld due to unjust enrichment, as the appellant had already passed on the duty burden to customers before filing the claim. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decision on unjust enrichment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>