https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362580 The Tribunal referred the case involving the credit of service tax on food subsidy for outsourced workers to a Larger Bench due to conflicting interpretations. The appellant argued that the food subsidy was part of charges to the manpower supplier, not outdoor catering. Despite citing statutory requirements, the Tribunal emphasized its inability to modify laws and referred the case for resolution, similar to another case. The Tribunal recognized the statutory obligation under the Factories Act but maintained it couldn't expand the CENVAT Credit Rules, deciding to refer the matter to the Hon'ble President for the constitution of a Larger Bench to address conflicting decisions on credit for outdoor catering services. en-us Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jun 2018 07:15:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362580 The Tribunal referred the case involving the credit of service tax on food subsidy for outsourced workers to a Larger Bench due to conflicting interpretations. The appellant argued that the food subsidy was part of charges to the manpower supplier, not outdoor catering. Despite citing statutory requirements, the Tribunal emphasized its inability to modify laws and referred the case for resolution, similar to another case. The Tribunal recognized the statutory obligation under the Factories Act but maintained it couldn't expand the CENVAT Credit Rules, deciding to refer the matter to the Hon'ble President for the constitution of a Larger Bench to address conflicting decisions on credit for outdoor catering services. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362580