<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2725 - ITAT Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to add disputed sums as undisclosed investments under section 69 of the Act for the appellant involved in fraudulent billing activities related to bogus shares transactions. The Tribunal found no evidence to counter the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, leading to the dismissal of the appeals by the assessees on 7.10.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 20:57:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2725 - ITAT Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to add disputed sums as undisclosed investments under section 69 of the Act for the appellant involved in fraudulent billing activities related to bogus shares transactions. The Tribunal found no evidence to counter the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, leading to the dismissal of the appeals by the assessees on 7.10.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>