<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 222 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13498</link>
    <description>The High Court of Rajasthan ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning income tax assessment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude a specific amount from the assessment was upheld as it was established that the investment in question did not belong to the assessee. The Court emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s finding on ownership and deemed the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the amount justified, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument for a specific determination of the owner. The Court&#039;s decision favored the assessee, leading to the exclusion of the amount from the assessment without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:12:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 222 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13498</link>
      <description>The High Court of Rajasthan ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning income tax assessment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude a specific amount from the assessment was upheld as it was established that the investment in question did not belong to the assessee. The Court emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s finding on ownership and deemed the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the amount justified, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument for a specific determination of the owner. The Court&#039;s decision favored the assessee, leading to the exclusion of the amount from the assessment without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>