<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 176 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13495</link>
    <description>Income derived by a lessee from sub-letting is not taxable as income from house property where the lessee cannot be treated as the owner under sections 22 to 27 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 22 taxes only the annual value of property owned by the assessee, while section 27 expands ownership for that purpose but excludes a person whose rights arise only under a lease from month to month or for a term not exceeding one year. On the stated facts, an 11-month lease with an option to continue fell within that exclusion, so the deeming definition of owner did not apply and the sub-let income could not be brought under the head &quot;Income from house property.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:07:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 176 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13495</link>
      <description>Income derived by a lessee from sub-letting is not taxable as income from house property where the lessee cannot be treated as the owner under sections 22 to 27 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 22 taxes only the annual value of property owned by the assessee, while section 27 expands ownership for that purpose but excludes a person whose rights arise only under a lease from month to month or for a term not exceeding one year. On the stated facts, an 11-month lease with an option to continue fell within that exclusion, so the deeming definition of owner did not apply and the sub-let income could not be brought under the head &quot;Income from house property.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>