<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1373 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362546</link>
    <description>Contemporaneous records and the earlier adjudication were read together on harmonious construction to reconcile the factual recital with the release direction. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the record as confirming that the seized silver ornaments, Indian currency and Bahi Khatas had already been returned after seizure, and found no legal infirmity in the appellate order affirming that finding. The challenge therefore failed because the disputed non-gold articles stood supported by the record as returned, and the impugned order required no interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1373 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362546</link>
      <description>Contemporaneous records and the earlier adjudication were read together on harmonious construction to reconcile the factual recital with the release direction. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the record as confirming that the seized silver ornaments, Indian currency and Bahi Khatas had already been returned after seizure, and found no legal infirmity in the appellate order affirming that finding. The challenge therefore failed because the disputed non-gold articles stood supported by the record as returned, and the impugned order required no interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>