<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1355 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362528</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the appellant was liable for Service Tax on Manpower Supply Services provided, rejecting the argument that the responsibility lay with the service recipient. The tribunal found the services were not part of construction services or a sub-contract, and no evidence showed the main contractor paid the Service Tax. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Service Tax liability on the Manpower Supply Services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:39:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1355 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362528</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the appellant was liable for Service Tax on Manpower Supply Services provided, rejecting the argument that the responsibility lay with the service recipient. The tribunal found the services were not part of construction services or a sub-contract, and no evidence showed the main contractor paid the Service Tax. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Service Tax liability on the Manpower Supply Services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>