<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1352 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362525</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the filing delay and then examined the appeal on merits, finding no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment under challenge. The appeal was dismissed for want of merit, but the Court expressly left the substantive question of law open and did not adjudicate it in this order. The procedural condonation was recorded before the merits were considered, and the order preserves the legal issue for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:39:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1352 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362525</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the filing delay and then examined the appeal on merits, finding no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment under challenge. The appeal was dismissed for want of merit, but the Court expressly left the substantive question of law open and did not adjudicate it in this order. The procedural condonation was recorded before the merits were considered, and the order preserves the legal issue for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>