<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 120 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13491</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that income from hiring air conditioners should be classified as business income. The Tribunal had set aside the Commissioner&#039;s revision order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the continuity of the assessee&#039;s business activity despite a change in lessee. The HC found no substantial question of law, dismissing the appeal and underscoring the importance of substantial evidence and legal principles in income classification for taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 120 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13491</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that income from hiring air conditioners should be classified as business income. The Tribunal had set aside the Commissioner&#039;s revision order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the continuity of the assessee&#039;s business activity despite a change in lessee. The HC found no substantial question of law, dismissing the appeal and underscoring the importance of substantial evidence and legal principles in income classification for taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>