<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1347 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal of the appellant based on legal arguments, the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A), and established precedents supporting the use of CENVAT credit for duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1347 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal of the appellant based on legal arguments, the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A), and established precedents supporting the use of CENVAT credit for duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>