<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 168 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13489</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the Department&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order that had permitted rectification under Section 254(2) of the Act. The Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by rehearing the appeal and reversing its prior decision after the assessee opted for the KVSS. The HC clarified that Section 254(2) permits only correction of apparent mistakes, not reconsideration of merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 168 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13489</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the Department&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order that had permitted rectification under Section 254(2) of the Act. The Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by rehearing the appeal and reversing its prior decision after the assessee opted for the KVSS. The HC clarified that Section 254(2) permits only correction of apparent mistakes, not reconsideration of merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>