<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 973 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273471</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, the civil appeal was admitted, and no stay was granted. The matter was directed to be tagged with connected appeals, leaving the substantive central excise issues open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 09:59:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 973 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273471</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, the civil appeal was admitted, and no stay was granted. The matter was directed to be tagged with connected appeals, leaving the substantive central excise issues open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>