https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273470 Outdoor catering, clearing and forwarding, and outward GTA services were treated as eligible input services for Cenvat credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 because earlier binding precedents had already covered those service categories. The Rajasthan HC noted that the Bombay HC ruling relied on by the Tribunal continued to hold the field and that the disputed services had been held cenvatable in the cited decisions. On that basis, no independent ground for interference was made out, the assessee's entitlement to Cenvat credit was sustained, and the departmental appeal failed as no substantial question of law arose. en-us Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jun 2018 07:41:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273470 Outdoor catering, clearing and forwarding, and outward GTA services were treated as eligible input services for Cenvat credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 because earlier binding precedents had already covered those service categories. The Rajasthan HC noted that the Bombay HC ruling relied on by the Tribunal continued to hold the field and that the disputed services had been held cenvatable in the cited decisions. On that basis, no independent ground for interference was made out, the assessee's entitlement to Cenvat credit was sustained, and the departmental appeal failed as no substantial question of law arose. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273470