<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1108 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273461</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of Motor Car maintenance expenses and Telephone expenses. The Tribunal found that the disallowances made by the AO and partly sustained by the CIT(A) were adhoc and not supported by specific evidence of unverifiable expenses. As the assessee maintained detailed accounts and no specific unsupported vouchers were identified, the Tribunal deleted the disallowances of both expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:28:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1108 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273461</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of Motor Car maintenance expenses and Telephone expenses. The Tribunal found that the disallowances made by the AO and partly sustained by the CIT(A) were adhoc and not supported by specific evidence of unverifiable expenses. As the assessee maintained detailed accounts and no specific unsupported vouchers were identified, the Tribunal deleted the disallowances of both expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>