<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1453 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273453</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was governed by the CBDT monetary limit circular read with section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Because the tax effect was below the prescribed threshold, the circular was treated as having statutory force and the appeal filed in breach of that limit was not maintainable. The matter could not be entertained on merits and stood dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:26:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1453 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273453</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was governed by the CBDT monetary limit circular read with section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Because the tax effect was below the prescribed threshold, the circular was treated as having statutory force and the appeal filed in breach of that limit was not maintainable. The matter could not be entertained on merits and stood dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>