<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1056 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273451</link>
    <description>A power licensee&#039;s licence clauses, read with later amendments and the history of supply, were held to permit direct retail supply to consumers within the overlapping area, not merely bulk supply to other licensees. The SC found that the appellate tribunal misread the licences by restricting the licencee to bulk supply, and that the commission exceeded the dispute by advancing a separate level-playing-field theory and issuing unasked directions. The later open access and wheeling framework did not ate the licencee&#039;s entitlement under the licences. The directions of the commission and the appellate tribunal were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 16:43:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1056 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273451</link>
      <description>A power licensee&#039;s licence clauses, read with later amendments and the history of supply, were held to permit direct retail supply to consumers within the overlapping area, not merely bulk supply to other licensees. The SC found that the appellate tribunal misread the licences by restricting the licencee to bulk supply, and that the commission exceeded the dispute by advancing a separate level-playing-field theory and issuing unasked directions. The later open access and wheeling framework did not ate the licencee&#039;s entitlement under the licences. The directions of the commission and the appellate tribunal were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>