<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1307 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362480</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Hon&#039;ble Member on 20/06/2018 due to the failure to condone a 751-day delay in filing the appeal. The delay was attributed to the applicant&#039;s pursuit of an Export Obligation Discharge Certificate (EODC) from JDGFT and DGFT. Despite arguments of unintentional delay and citing legal precedents, the Member found the delay to be inexcusable, emphasizing the applicant&#039;s negligence. The Member noted the delay was solely due to engagement with JDGFT and DGFT, deeming it insufficient justification. Consequently, the condonation of delay application was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1307 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362480</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Hon&#039;ble Member on 20/06/2018 due to the failure to condone a 751-day delay in filing the appeal. The delay was attributed to the applicant&#039;s pursuit of an Export Obligation Discharge Certificate (EODC) from JDGFT and DGFT. Despite arguments of unintentional delay and citing legal precedents, the Member found the delay to be inexcusable, emphasizing the applicant&#039;s negligence. The Member noted the delay was solely due to engagement with JDGFT and DGFT, deeming it insufficient justification. Consequently, the condonation of delay application was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>