<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1304 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362477</link>
    <description>The writ appeal was allowed, setting aside the interim order of stay granted by the writ Court. The court found that the delay in challenging the Order-in-Original, coupled with the lack of justification for the interim stay, warranted interference with the writ Court&#039;s decision. The judgment emphasized the importance of timely legal actions in fiscal matters and the need to avoid unnecessary delays through interim orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1304 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362477</link>
      <description>The writ appeal was allowed, setting aside the interim order of stay granted by the writ Court. The court found that the delay in challenging the Order-in-Original, coupled with the lack of justification for the interim stay, warranted interference with the writ Court&#039;s decision. The judgment emphasized the importance of timely legal actions in fiscal matters and the need to avoid unnecessary delays through interim orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>