https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362475 The Tribunal rejected the appeal, affirming that the appellant was not entitled to CENVAT Credit on invoices from unregistered dealers, upholding the penalty for availing credit on ineligible documents, and denying the benefit of abatement under notification No. 1/2006/ST due to lack of retrospective eligibility explanation by the appellant. en-us Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Jul 2018 18:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362475 The Tribunal rejected the appeal, affirming that the appellant was not entitled to CENVAT Credit on invoices from unregistered dealers, upholding the penalty for availing credit on ineligible documents, and denying the benefit of abatement under notification No. 1/2006/ST due to lack of retrospective eligibility explanation by the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362475