https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362472 The tribunal set aside the denial of Cenvat credit on input services, including event management services, due to discrepancies in invoices not being in the appellant's name. The appellant provided evidence to rectify the issue, demonstrating the services were intended for them. The tribunal found the appellant acted in good faith and was entitled to avail Cenvat credit based on rectified and certified invoices. It was established that event management services qualified as an input service for the appellant, emphasizing the importance of valid evidence in establishing entitlement to Cenvat credit. en-us Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:18:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362472 The tribunal set aside the denial of Cenvat credit on input services, including event management services, due to discrepancies in invoices not being in the appellant's name. The appellant provided evidence to rectify the issue, demonstrating the services were intended for them. The tribunal found the appellant acted in good faith and was entitled to avail Cenvat credit based on rectified and certified invoices. It was established that event management services qualified as an input service for the appellant, emphasizing the importance of valid evidence in establishing entitlement to Cenvat credit. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362472