<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1293 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362466</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand of duty, interest, and penalties on the appellants in a case involving fabrication of body chassis received from a company. The duty was required to be paid for the entire body built, including the chassis valuation. Penalties were set aside based on a previous case precedent. Penalties imposed on related parties were also set aside, except for one party due to knowledge of short duty payment by a job worker. The judgment emphasized the importance of mala-fide intention and suppression of documents in penalty imposition, ultimately confirming duty with interest but setting aside penalties for all parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1293 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362466</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand of duty, interest, and penalties on the appellants in a case involving fabrication of body chassis received from a company. The duty was required to be paid for the entire body built, including the chassis valuation. Penalties were set aside based on a previous case precedent. Penalties imposed on related parties were also set aside, except for one party due to knowledge of short duty payment by a job worker. The judgment emphasized the importance of mala-fide intention and suppression of documents in penalty imposition, ultimately confirming duty with interest but setting aside penalties for all parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>