https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273446 The District Forum ordered the respondents to refund the amount with interest at 15% per annum due to the non-allotment of the site and failure to provide documents related to layout approval. The State Commission modified the interest rate and directed the refund of the principal amount with interest at 15% per annum. The Commission dismissed the revision petition due to a delay of 126 days, emphasizing the need for diligence in consumer protection matters. The claim for additional compensation was denied, stating no jurisdictional error or material irregularity was found in the impugned order. en-us Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Jun 2018 08:16:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273446 The District Forum ordered the respondents to refund the amount with interest at 15% per annum due to the non-allotment of the site and failure to provide documents related to layout approval. The State Commission modified the interest rate and directed the refund of the principal amount with interest at 15% per annum. The Commission dismissed the revision petition due to a delay of 126 days, emphasizing the need for diligence in consumer protection matters. The claim for additional compensation was denied, stating no jurisdictional error or material irregularity was found in the impugned order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273446