<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1392 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273441</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order adding Rs. 1,40,06,686 under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal allowed the respondent&#039;s appeal, citing non-interest bearing funds exceeding the investment in tax-free shares and interest income. The Revenue&#039;s reference to a conflicting decision was adjourned pending Supreme Court judgment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with precedent, holding that no disallowance could be made if interest-free funds exceeded investments. The substantial question of law favored the respondent, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 07:27:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1392 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273441</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order adding Rs. 1,40,06,686 under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal allowed the respondent&#039;s appeal, citing non-interest bearing funds exceeding the investment in tax-free shares and interest income. The Revenue&#039;s reference to a conflicting decision was adjourned pending Supreme Court judgment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with precedent, holding that no disallowance could be made if interest-free funds exceeded investments. The substantial question of law favored the respondent, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>