<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1607 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273443</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 147 was invalid and the addition of Rs. 40 lakhs under Section 68 was rightly deleted. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper recording of reasons for reopening assessments and the importance of allowing cross-examination to uphold principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 07:27:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1607 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273443</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 147 was invalid and the addition of Rs. 40 lakhs under Section 68 was rightly deleted. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper recording of reasons for reopening assessments and the importance of allowing cross-examination to uphold principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>