<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 146 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13476</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues. It affirmed that depreciation is allowable on stand-by spare parts, even if not used during the year, as they are considered &#039;used&#039; when kept ready for use. Additionally, expenses incurred for obtaining fixed deposits from the public were deemed revenue expenditure and thus deductible, as they are essential for business operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 146 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13476</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues. It affirmed that depreciation is allowable on stand-by spare parts, even if not used during the year, as they are considered &#039;used&#039; when kept ready for use. Additionally, expenses incurred for obtaining fixed deposits from the public were deemed revenue expenditure and thus deductible, as they are essential for business operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>