<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1270 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362443</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, overturning the disallowances imposed by lower authorities on interest expenses and professional fees. The Tribunal highlighted the adequacy of owned funds for investments and the lack of concrete evidence supporting the disallowance of professional fees. The Tribunal&#039;s decision in one appeal was applied to another, resulting in both appeals being successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 15:59:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1270 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362443</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, overturning the disallowances imposed by lower authorities on interest expenses and professional fees. The Tribunal highlighted the adequacy of owned funds for investments and the lack of concrete evidence supporting the disallowance of professional fees. The Tribunal&#039;s decision in one appeal was applied to another, resulting in both appeals being successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>