<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1263 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362436</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench upheld the order rejecting the appellant&#039;s application for restoration of its name. The Tribunal found that the Registrar of Companies followed proper procedures in issuing notices and publicizing the intended action, and the appellant failed to respond within the required time frame. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:54:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1263 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362436</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench upheld the order rejecting the appellant&#039;s application for restoration of its name. The Tribunal found that the Registrar of Companies followed proper procedures in issuing notices and publicizing the intended action, and the appellant failed to respond within the required time frame. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>