https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362432 The appeal by M/s Paharpur Colling Towers Limited (Operational Creditor) against the dismissal of their application under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was denied by the Appellate Tribunal. The dismissal was upheld due to the existence of a dispute and the incorrect filing of the application by the Company Secretary, who was found not authorized to file on behalf of the creditor. The Tribunal emphasized that a "Power of Attorney Holder" cannot file on behalf of a Financial or Operational Creditor. The Appellant was advised to pursue any admitted dues through the appropriate forum. en-us Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:54:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362432 The appeal by M/s Paharpur Colling Towers Limited (Operational Creditor) against the dismissal of their application under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was denied by the Appellate Tribunal. The dismissal was upheld due to the existence of a dispute and the incorrect filing of the application by the Company Secretary, who was found not authorized to file on behalf of the creditor. The Tribunal emphasized that a "Power of Attorney Holder" cannot file on behalf of a Financial or Operational Creditor. The Appellant was advised to pursue any admitted dues through the appropriate forum. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362432