<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1255 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362428</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, recognizing their eligibility for exemption under specified notifications for services related to the transmission of electricity. The Tribunal disagreed with the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the exemption claim, stating that the appellant&#039;s work fell under the exemption provided by relevant notifications. The Tribunal also addressed the maintainability of the appeal due to the disputed amount and found the appellant entitled to the exemption benefit, setting aside the impugned order and granting the appellant the exemption sought, along with consequential benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:40:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1255 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362428</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, recognizing their eligibility for exemption under specified notifications for services related to the transmission of electricity. The Tribunal disagreed with the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the exemption claim, stating that the appellant&#039;s work fell under the exemption provided by relevant notifications. The Tribunal also addressed the maintainability of the appeal due to the disputed amount and found the appellant entitled to the exemption benefit, setting aside the impugned order and granting the appellant the exemption sought, along with consequential benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>