<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1253 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authority to drop proceedings against a bank for Service Tax liability. The Department&#039;s appeal was rejected as the Tribunal found that the bank&#039;s use of consolidated invoices adequately covered the Service Tax obligations for proprietary transactions, in accordance with legal provisions and a Circular by CBEC. The Tribunal determined that the bank&#039;s fixed charge per transaction was sufficient for Service Tax payment, dismissing the Department&#039;s argument that the bank should pay at a different rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:40:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1253 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authority to drop proceedings against a bank for Service Tax liability. The Department&#039;s appeal was rejected as the Tribunal found that the bank&#039;s use of consolidated invoices adequately covered the Service Tax obligations for proprietary transactions, in accordance with legal provisions and a Circular by CBEC. The Tribunal determined that the bank&#039;s fixed charge per transaction was sufficient for Service Tax payment, dismissing the Department&#039;s argument that the bank should pay at a different rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>