https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362418 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal of sponge iron. The decision was based on the lack of substantial evidence linking the appellant to the alleged clandestine activity, as investigations against the company supplying the sponge iron had been set aside. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence to support charges of clandestine removal, ultimately leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant. en-us Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:32:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362418 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal of sponge iron. The decision was based on the lack of substantial evidence linking the appellant to the alleged clandestine activity, as investigations against the company supplying the sponge iron had been set aside. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence to support charges of clandestine removal, ultimately leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362418