https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362417 The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal reducing duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant for Central Excise duty evasion. The appellant's argument that discounts on goods would place them within the exemption limit was rejected due to insufficient evidence. The duty demand was based on recovered invoices and kacha parchies, with discounts limited to 30%. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere and rejected the appeal, affirming the reduced duty demand and penalties. en-us Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:32:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362417 The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal reducing duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant for Central Excise duty evasion. The appellant's argument that discounts on goods would place them within the exemption limit was rejected due to insufficient evidence. The duty demand was based on recovered invoices and kacha parchies, with discounts limited to 30%. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere and rejected the appeal, affirming the reduced duty demand and penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362417