<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1240 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s cash transactions were genuine, supported by documentation, and made from disclosed sources. Emphasizing business expediency and lack of tax evasion intent, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that disallowance under Section 40A(3) was unjustified. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 20:35:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1240 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s cash transactions were genuine, supported by documentation, and made from disclosed sources. Emphasizing business expediency and lack of tax evasion intent, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that disallowance under Section 40A(3) was unjustified. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>