<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1239 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362412</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the validity of the VAT Audit authorized by the Commissioner in compliance with Section 64(4) of the TNVAT Act. The Joint Commissioner&#039;s role was deemed administrative, not a delegation of power, distinguishing it from previous cases. The court found the petitioner&#039;s arguments unfounded, emphasizing the proper execution of the audit process. The VAT Audit report and subsequent proceedings were deemed valid, advising the petitioner to pursue legal remedies appropriately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1239 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362412</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the validity of the VAT Audit authorized by the Commissioner in compliance with Section 64(4) of the TNVAT Act. The Joint Commissioner&#039;s role was deemed administrative, not a delegation of power, distinguishing it from previous cases. The court found the petitioner&#039;s arguments unfounded, emphasizing the proper execution of the audit process. The VAT Audit report and subsequent proceedings were deemed valid, advising the petitioner to pursue legal remedies appropriately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>