https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273420 The court allowed the petition for restoration of the company's name under S.560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found procedural lapses in the strike-off proceedings and accepted the petitioner's evidence of active operations and compliance. The company's revival was permitted subject to fulfilling outstanding requirements, including payment of fees. The court granted the respondent liberty to take penal action for alleged non-compliance. The judgment concluded with the restoration of the company's name to the Register with specified conditions and permissions for further actions. en-us Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:48:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273420 The court allowed the petition for restoration of the company's name under S.560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found procedural lapses in the strike-off proceedings and accepted the petitioner's evidence of active operations and compliance. The company's revival was permitted subject to fulfilling outstanding requirements, including payment of fees. The court granted the respondent liberty to take penal action for alleged non-compliance. The judgment concluded with the restoration of the company's name to the Register with specified conditions and permissions for further actions. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273420