<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 955 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273419</link>
    <description>The court upheld the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the assessee had fulfilled its initial onus by providing necessary details, shifting the burden to the Assessing Officer to verify. Since the Assessing Officer failed to conduct proper verification, the additions were deemed unjustified. Both the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal correctly applied the law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:07:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 955 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273419</link>
      <description>The court upheld the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the assessee had fulfilled its initial onus by providing necessary details, shifting the burden to the Assessing Officer to verify. Since the Assessing Officer failed to conduct proper verification, the additions were deemed unjustified. Both the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal correctly applied the law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>