<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 153 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13466</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, and remanded the case to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on the quantum of penalty to be imposed on the assessee. The court emphasized the need for reconsideration due to a previous court order affecting the penalty imposition. The Tribunal was directed to complete the reconsideration within three months, with no costs awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 11:15:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 153 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13466</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, and remanded the case to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on the quantum of penalty to be imposed on the assessee. The court emphasized the need for reconsideration due to a previous court order affecting the penalty imposition. The Tribunal was directed to complete the reconsideration within three months, with no costs awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>