<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1237 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362410</link>
    <description>The High Court interpreted Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding the disallowance of expenditure to earn exempted income. The Court analyzed the application of Rule 8D and considered judicial pronouncements, emphasizing the necessity of a rational nexus between expenditure and income. Referring to relevant case law, the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and rejected the Stay Application, finding no substantial question of law in the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:01:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1237 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362410</link>
      <description>The High Court interpreted Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding the disallowance of expenditure to earn exempted income. The Court analyzed the application of Rule 8D and considered judicial pronouncements, emphasizing the necessity of a rational nexus between expenditure and income. Referring to relevant case law, the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and rejected the Stay Application, finding no substantial question of law in the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>