<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1223 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362396</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the block assessment under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the satisfaction note was not recorded as required by law, was anti-dated, and the assessment was time-barred. The materials used for the assessment were improperly sourced from the assessee&#039;s premises rather than the searched person, invalidating the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 08:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1223 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362396</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the block assessment under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the satisfaction note was not recorded as required by law, was anti-dated, and the assessment was time-barred. The materials used for the assessment were improperly sourced from the assessee&#039;s premises rather than the searched person, invalidating the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>