<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1220 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362393</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rectified the mistake in the order dated 31.07.2017, explicitly stating that no interest is payable on the specified differential duty for the period of provisional assessment from 02.06.2008 to 30.10.2010. The rectification was granted based on established legal principles and the acknowledgment of the payment made during the provisional assessment period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1220 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362393</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rectified the mistake in the order dated 31.07.2017, explicitly stating that no interest is payable on the specified differential duty for the period of provisional assessment from 02.06.2008 to 30.10.2010. The rectification was granted based on established legal principles and the acknowledgment of the payment made during the provisional assessment period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>