https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362389 The case involved two applications seeking a stay of orders passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Ahmadabad. The appellant argued that the remand order to decide the taxability of services provided was without jurisdiction. The Revenue agreed to hear the appeal directly. The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the matter to determine if the services rendered qualified as export services and if the appellant was eligible for a refund. The tribunal found that the issue of taxability was not raised initially, rendering the remand order unsustainable. The matter was remanded for further assessment. en-us Thu, 19 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:00:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362389 The case involved two applications seeking a stay of orders passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Ahmadabad. The appellant argued that the remand order to decide the taxability of services provided was without jurisdiction. The Revenue agreed to hear the appeal directly. The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the matter to determine if the services rendered qualified as export services and if the appellant was eligible for a refund. The tribunal found that the issue of taxability was not raised initially, rendering the remand order unsustainable. The matter was remanded for further assessment. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 19 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362389